0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀϹݰ£È£»ç Àλç°í°úµµ±¸ ¼öÁ¤ ¹× ½Å·Úµµ, Ÿ´çµµ °ËÁõ

Revision of Performance Appraisal Tool and Verification of Reliability and Validity

ÀÓ»ó°£È£¿¬±¸ 2011³â 17±Ç 1È£ p.70 ~ 80
KMID : 1004620110170010070
¹Ú±¤¿Á ( Park Kwang-Ok ) - ¼øõ´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

¹Ú¼º¾Ö ( Park Sung-Ae ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
¹Ú¼ºÈñ ( Park Sung-Hee ) - Çѱ¹¹æ¼ÛÅë½Å´ëÇб³ Æò»ý´ëÇпø
ÀÌÀºÈñ ( Lee Eun-Hee ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
±è¸í¾Ö ( Kim Myung-Ae ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø °£È£ºÎ
°û¿ùÈñ ( Kwag Wol-Hee ) - µ¿±¹´ëÇб³ Àϻ꺴¿ø

Abstract

Purpose: This study was done to develop performance appraisal guidelines based on the standardized appraisal tool developed in a previous study.

Methods: A preliminary investigation was done to draw up a draft guidelines through a literature review. To verify the content validity of the guidelines, 10 nurse managers reviewed the standardized appraisal tool and draft guidelines. Through this process, the performance appraisal guidelines were revised and supplemented. In order to examine the reliability and validity of the guidelines, 13 nurse managers conducted performance appraisal for 178 nurses.

Results: As a result, the items of pre-existing tool was reduced from 63 to 30 for usefulness, and guidelines for each items were developed.

Conclusion: The revised performance appraisal tool and guidelines are expected to be useful in objectively evaluating nursing performance objectively.
KeyWords
Àλç°í°ú, Àλç°í°úµµ±¸ Áöħ
Performance appraisal, Guideline
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)